A & P: Analysis of Chapter 8-Tolstoy- Art as Communication of Feeling 10/2/09

I always wondered what to call art that no one ever observes. In class, the perfect term for it was brought up. Expression. A work of art is just an expression of the emotions of the artist if no one ever observes it. The lack of observance is a failure of communication. In order for a work of art to truly be a work of art it must convey an emotion to the observer that the observer can understand and relate to. For example, a work of art that intends to communicate fear must have an observer that has experienced fear in order to make the work, art and not just expression. Tolstoy stresses the ability of art to communicate emotion over the form and beauty of the work of art. I believe that both of are equal importance to determining a work of art. Yes, a work of art does have to communicate and emotion to the observer, but the beauty and form of the work of art is what appeals to the observer. If I were to see an ugly work of art, I wouldn't even regard it or even attempt to see the emotion that the artist is trying to communicate. Therefore, an artist needs to emphasize equal importance on beauty and the emotion that he/she is trying to communicate when creating a work of art. Otherwise their attempt at creating an artwork could just be expression.
Tolstoy believes that art must be strictly aesthetic. So, I pose the question; should moral and social values also play a role in defining art?